DPDP Act vs GDPR: 15 Key Differences Every Indian Business Must Know
- Vineeth Nair 
- Oct 1
- 4 min read
Indian businesses operating globally or serving international customers often wonder how India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act compares to Europe's General Data Protection Regulation. While both laws aim to protect personal data, they take distinctly different approaches that create unique compliance requirements.

Understanding these differences isn't just academic - it determines your compliance strategy, technology investments, and operational procedures. Let's break down the 15 most critical differences that directly impact how you run your business.
Scope and Coverage Differences
1. Data Type Coverage
DPDP Act: Applies only to digital personal data - information in electronic form or digitized from physical documents.
GDPR: Covers all personal data regardless of format - digital files, paper documents, audio recordings, and photographs.
Business Impact: Indian companies can process physical documents without DPDP compliance, while European operations require full GDPR compliance for all data formats.
2. Territorial Application
DPDP Act: Applies to data processed in India and data processed outside India if offering goods/services to Indians.
GDPR: Applies to EU residents' data regardless of where processing occurs globally.
Business Impact: DPDP has a narrower reach than GDPR's global application, but both create extraterritorial obligations.
3. Data Classification Systems
DPDP Act: Treats all personal data equally without special categories.
GDPR: Creates special categories (health, biometric, racial data) requiring enhanced protection.
Business Impact: DPDP compliance is simpler with uniform rules, while GDPR requires layered security measures.
Legal Basis for Processing
4. Consent Requirements
DPDP Act: Primarily consent-based with limited "legitimate uses" exceptions.
GDPR: Six legal bases including consent, legitimate interests, vital interests, and legal obligations.
Business Impact: Indian businesses must obtain explicit consent for most processing, while EU operations can rely on legitimate interests for many activities.
5. Children's Data Protection
DPDP Act: Fixed age threshold of 18 years with verifiable parental consent required.
GDPR: Flexible threshold between 13-16 years set by individual EU countries.
Business Impact: Indian platforms face stricter age restrictions, requiring robust age verification systems.
Organizational Requirements
6. Data Protection Officers
DPDP Act: No mandatory DPO requirement for most organizations.
GDPR: Mandatory DPOs for public authorities and organizations processing special categories at scale.
Business Impact: European operations require dedicated privacy professionals, while Indian compliance can be managed through existing roles.
7. Privacy Impact Assessments
DPDP Act: No explicit DPIA requirements.
GDPR: Mandatory DPIAs for high-risk processing activities.
Business Impact: GDPR compliance involves more upfront assessment work, while DPDP focuses on operational compliance.
8. Data Protection by Design
DPDP Act: General requirement for reasonable security measures.
GDPR: Explicit privacy by design and default obligations.
Business Impact: European systems require built-in privacy controls, while Indian requirements are more flexible.
Cross-Border Data Transfers
9. Transfer Mechanisms
DPDP Act: Simple "negative list" approach - transfers allowed except to restricted countries.
GDPR: Complex adequacy decisions, Standard Contractual Clauses, and Binding Corporate Rules.
Business Impact: International data flows are simpler under DPDP but may face future restrictions as the negative list expands.
Enforcement and Penalties
10. Regulatory Structure
DPDP Act: Centralized Data Protection Board of India appointed by government.
GDPR: Independent supervisory authorities in each EU member state.
Business Impact: Indian businesses deal with single regulator, while European operations navigate multiple authorities.
11. Penalty Calculations
DPDP Act: Fixed maximum penalties up to ₹250 crores regardless of company size.
GDPR: Revenue-based penalties up to 4% of global annual turnover.
Business Impact: Large corporations face higher penalties under GDPR, while smaller companies face proportionally higher risks under DPDP.
Operational Differences
12. Breach Notification Timelines
DPDP Act: 72-hour notification to authority regardless of risk level.
GDPR: 72-hour notification only for breaches likely to result in risk to individuals.
Business Impact: Indian companies must report all breaches, creating higher administrative burden.
13. Consent Management
DPDP Act: Introduces registered Consent Managers as intermediaries.
GDPR: No specific consent management intermediaries.
Business Impact: Indian businesses can leverage centralized consent platforms, while European operations require direct consent relationships.
14. Record-Keeping Requirements
DPDP Act: Limited record-keeping obligations specified in rules.
GDPR: Comprehensive records of processing activities required.
Business Impact: European operations need detailed documentation systems, while Indian requirements are less prescriptive.
15. Employee Data Processing
DPDP Act: Specific employment-related processing exceptions without consent.
GDPR: Relies on employment contract or legitimate interest grounds.
Business Impact: Indian HR systems have clearer exemptions, while European employee data requires careful legal basis analysis.
Strategic Compliance Implications
For Indian Companies Going Global
Organizations expanding to Europe must layer GDPR requirements on top of DPDP compliance, creating dual obligations that often conflict. The consent-heavy DPDP approach may not satisfy GDPR's legitimate interest requirements.
For Global Companies in India
International businesses must adapt their global privacy frameworks to accommodate DPDP's unique features like Consent Managers and uniform data treatment while maintaining GDPR compliance for European users.
Technology Investment Priorities
Companies operating under both frameworks need flexible privacy management platforms that can handle GDPR's complex legal bases alongside DPDP's consent-centric approach, with different user interfaces for different jurisdictions.
The DPDP Act represents India's sovereign approach to data protection, balancing individual rights with practical business needs in ways that differ significantly from European models. Success requires understanding these differences and building compliance strategies that respect both frameworks without creating operational conflicts.






Comments